CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures Tool. File 1: CSAT_GPRA Client Outcome Measures File 2: CSAT_GPRA Client Outcome. HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Performance and Results Act (GPRA) to report program outcomes as a. HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs. United States Department Of Health And Human Services.

Author: Mujar Bajas
Country: Guinea
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 11 October 2005
Pages: 263
PDF File Size: 11.47 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.46 Mb
ISBN: 888-5-14455-865-1
Downloads: 35750
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Kazikus

The results in Table 4 support the validity and inter-rater reliability of the measures in terms of correspondence between the reports of graduates and relatives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a post-treatment Routine Outcome Monitoring ROM system as a tool for measuring, and improving, results from drug rehabilitation services.

Light aerobic exercise and dry-heat sauna concurrent with nutrient support of vitamins, minerals and cold-pressed oils aimed at addressing the effects of residual drug and other protracted withdrawal symptoms.

While csqt efficacy can be readily quantified using research-driven clinical trial methods gprz very strict and controlled research parameters, such stringent design requirements—and associated costs—are rarely practical for the typical community-based treatment program.

HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs

Discretionary grants include 10—20 percent funding for dedicated follow- up activities that are expected to attempt contact with percent of all discharged clients and, minimally, obtain data from 80 percent.

This module is designed to help prevent relapse by training the individual to recognize the characteristics of two distinct types of personalities—the social personality and the antisocial personality—and the ways that relationships with each type affect individual success, survival, drug use, or criminality. Using focus groups to understand program performance.

Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: Research at Chestnut Health Systems shows that while telephone follow-up solely for organizational feedback does not appear to improve post-treatment outcomes, 15 15—20 minute telephone-based post-treatment counseling support can be an effective form of step-down treatment that increases engagement and sobriety while lowering relapse rates. As an additional tool to support their efforts to remain stable and productive following release, clients review essays on a group of precepts that comprise a non-religious, social skills, common sense moral code.

HIV Open Data Project: CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs (ICPSR 34729)

As can be seen in Table 6the frequency of re-entry into treatment since graduation is estimated at a modest 12 percent, approximately one-third of those who reported substance use after program completion. A therapeutic step to help the individual formulate personal ethical guidelines and address the consequences of past activities that were outside these guidelines.


Thereafter, staff were instructed to call collateral contacts after 4 unsuccessful attempts at reaching program graduate. Increasing the reliability of systems that can be used to measure outcomes on an ongoing basis could mark a step forward for rehabilitation clients and providers alike.

These instructions are for collecting the center for substance abuse treatment csat government performance and results act gpra core client outcome measures for discretionary.

Preliminary outcomes from the assertive continuing care experiment for adolescents discharged from residential treatment.


Although the original DAANES design included a 6-month outcomes measure of the percentage of patients who remained abstinent, attempts to obtain this follow-up data were csaf by non-compliance and it is not collected at this time. Construct validation of the drug problem items Construct validity is tested by the extent to which similar, yet distinct, measures of treatment effectiveness give consistent answers.

A Simplified Method for Routine Outcome Monitoring after Drug Abuse Treatment

This article has been corrected. Currently, treatment staff submit web-based data at three points in time: Funding for this work was provided by Narconon of Oklahoma and Narconon International. Excepting the first follow-up point, this dsat consistently produced a representative sampling exceeding 80 percent and required very little staff training. To more easily maintain contact with clients once they leave the facility, the project implemented a client tracking system to include:.

Section i is completed by program staff about the client only at followup. This project was undertaken at the request of a program desiring to continuously improve treatment results including those that are not as expected.

These instructions are for collecting the center for substance abuse treatment csat government performance and results act gpra core client outcome measures for. The Workplace Outcomes Suite WOS can detect statistically significant changes in absenteeism, presenteeism, work engagement, life satisfaction, and workplace distress over day follow-up periods, and with sample sizes as small as 50 clients.

Midway through the project, staff requested inclusion of questions to measure alcohol use to intoxication and any illicit drug use after program completion.

  CAT 930G PDF

Collecting complete bpra information at intake including home, business and cell phone numbers, email address and street address. Key aspects of the Narconon Drug Rehabilitation program were advantageous to developing the follow-up methodology and questionnaire:.

Csat gpra samhsa substance abuse and mental health. Added burden proportion is an adjustment reflecting customary and usual business practices programs engage in e.

Journal List Subst Abuse v.

Severity of the treatment population A total of subjects were identified who completed the program and returned to their uncontrolled, natural environment. The program is characterized by a lower ratio of staff to participants, more hours of staff contact time and close monitoring of treatment implementation protocols, characteristics common to programs with better retention and engagement in treatment. For those clients who complete the full program, two full-time staff are responsible for all aspects of discharge planning, community re-integration follow-up, and the six-month routine outcome monitoring interview.

A Simplified Method for Routine Outcome Monitoring after Drug Abuse Treatment

Although the intercorrelations are not particularly large, there is sufficient commonality among the responses to support the inclusion of each variable in a broad measure of drug abuse-related quality of life. After the third sample period, collateral correlation was analyzed see results section and it was determined that the graduate data was reliable.

If the situation is severe enough to warrant it, the staff member will encourage the graduate to return to the Narconon center so that the difficulties can be reviewed, addressed in depth, and corrected.

The pilot data in this report shows that existing treatment and administrative staff utilizing this system csqt able to:. To find this information, go to section b of the csat gpra tool. This system is designed to provide meaningful data regarding treatment success that can be used for quality management purposes by a treatment facility. For example, in the California Treatment Outcome Project CalTOP implemented a center, staff-based pilot project with a sophisticated client-tracking database to collect client information at enrollment, 3-months and 9-months post enrollment.

Describe your program it is important to provide a brief overview of your program.