Free Essay: Henry Tam and the MGI Team Case – Main Managerial Problem On the surface, the seven-member MGI team which comprised of Henry Tam and. The case study is about the process of team working and processes to be followed to understand your peers and constructively work with them. Case Questions: Henry Tam and the MGI Team 1. a) What is your evaluation of the MGI s team processes? b) What were the root causes of the problems?.
|Published (Last):||23 December 2010|
|PDF File Size:||15.58 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.62 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Business and Environment Business History Entrepreneurship.
Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users Choose a Membership Plan. What are the strengths of the MGI team?
An Analysis of Henry Tam and the MGI Team
Myi student team was extremely goal oriented and eventually focused on taking the company in an initial direction to market the product toward the educational market. It lacks the organizational structure of a command group with specific reporting relationships. The business plan was not completed by the appropriated time.
Also, knowing how to manage agreements and disagreements will help the team to produce better performance among its task and interpersonal relationship. Although there appeared to be a common goal shared by yenry members of team — preparing a business plan for MGI — the group could come to no Sorry, but full essay samples are available only for registered users.
For Alex, he views the differences simply as people wanting to be thorough, and coming from different experiences and skill levels.
Henry Tam & MGI Team Case Essay
Menu Skip to content. Their poor communication resulted in-group conflicts and lack of cohesion as a whole. He stated that he is not very aggressive in group conversations.
All of us were happy mgj be working together and we were motivated, but certain allegiances cropped up, basically around HBS versus the Russians. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: He feels comfortable with the core leadership because he is not aggressive in a group setting.
There was also no system of feedback from which they could find their teeam and improve from them.
An Analysis of Henry Tam and the MGI Team | College Writing Samples
If Henry was an effective group leader he would have planned better. While Dav, commented that znd program needed technological help, the design of the software game was excellent. More drastic steps could be taken, but would require much more change. Conclusion Creating unity among the different personalities present in the MGI group is an imperative recommendation that will have a huge impact.
A clear understanding of what has to be accomplished. Cite View Details Educators. The goal that has been described here means the lack of explaining and giving direction from one to another.
An effective leader is skillful in leading teams. Team work requires both independent work and team collaboration.
Dana will present an idea knowing Sasha will disagree. Dana and Sasha were also sharing a negative chemistry, as Roman recalls pg. Team casd were putting fault on each other, as seen by Igor and Roman blaming Sasha for ignoring sales, while Sasha blamed Henry and others for not utilizing his contributions.
Henry Tam and the Mgi Team | Essay Writing Service A+
The blurring roles caused to team to remain inefficient. The cultural differences that the members of the MGI team posses are a liability. In contrast, each member are adherent to their style or behavior in their own way.
Three or perhaps four different cultures were represented on the team.
Sasha expresses a little about the different characteristics of different group members.